How to settle the abortion debate once and for all

Well, it seems like the Supreme Court is looking to overturn Roe v Wade, and predictably the dames are all hysterical about it. As a 40-year-old man with a vasectomy, I think I am uniquely qualified to opine on this subject. After all, I alone proceed from a basis of pure rationality, without all those womanly passions getting inflamed.

It’s a contentious debate, of course, so let’s try to be fair to people on both sides. Those on the “pro-choice” side believe that every woman should have access to a safe abortion. Those on the “pro-life” side believe that life truly begins at conception, and that aborting a fetus even in the early stages is tantamount to murder. Each side has a point. And many people on both sides would also agree that their position isn’t necessarily absolute. Many of those who oppose abortion, for example, make allowances for cases of rape or incest.

So here’s my suggestion. I’ve thought this over long and hard, bringing all of my hard-won wisdom to bear, and I think I have the solution. There is one, and only one condition under which it should be acceptable for a woman to seek an abortion. That condition is:

If she wants one.

I know, I know. It sounds crazy. How would this work in practice? How can we truly know what is in the mind of a woman all hopped up on pregnancy hormones? Well, let’s imagine a woman who goes to her doctor and says she wants an abortion. Here we apply Occam’s Razor — one of our favorite philosophical devices, right fellas? — and conclude that, if this woman is trying to get an abortion, then she must want one. Q.E.D.

Sure, you’re thinking, maybe we can allow grown women to make this choice. What about minors? Do we really think that a 14-year-old girl is mature enough to decide on her own to terminate a pregnancy without the informed consent of the uncle who impregnated her? Personally, I think we baby kids too much these days. If you’re old enough to ride your bike to the abortion clinic, then in my opinion you’re old enough to go inside.

Restricting the right to terminate a pregnancy only to those women who want to do so would really simplify a lot of things. Finally, the government could get out of the business of policing our bodies and get back to what really matters: spraying chemtrails.


What's new in this iOS update

The new version of iOS is here! Update now to 15.4.1 for the following improvements:

  • Subtly repositioning all of your existing apps

  • Mandatory installation of apps you will never use and can’t delete

  • It’s even harder to make sure you closed the private tabs you were watching porno in

  • Functionality that we won’t explain and which you will accidentally trigger and be unable to figure out how to undo

  • Bug fixes

  • Apple Pay will pursue you from app to app. You cannot hide. Sign up for Apple Pay!

  • Changed the way to take screenshots just as a goof

  • Even worse keyboard predictions

  • Security improvements

  • Security breaches

In response to recent allegations about my leadership style at FaceMelter Games

As Chief Creative Officer and Head Visionarian here at FaceMelter Games, nothing is more important to me than the happiness and well-being of my team. I’ve always considered being a two-time “Auteur of the Year” winner at the Game Awards to be a group achievement.

Look, these awards and sales figures don’t just happen on their own. It takes a whole team to make a video game — to faithfully and unquestioningly execute the creative vision exactly as it’s laid out across scraps of notebook paper and late-night emails. That’s something I might have been taking for granted.

Like many of you, I was distressed and chastened when the recent allegations came out about our workplace dynamics. It does no good to point fingers. Let’s agree that we all share some of the blame for the high turnover, endemic burnout, and abusive management style that our company has allegedly been experiencing. After all, it takes two to tango.

I take my leadership role seriously. Do I have high standards? Absolutely. Do I sometimes push teammates a little hard? Sure, but only to help them reach their potential. Do I solicit sensitive information about my employees’ personal lives so that I can weaponize it at a time of my choosing in order to assert my dominance? If so, I assure you it was only and ever in service of making the very best games possible. Maybe I just cared too much.

I’ll say it again: making games is a team effort. And without a happy and high-functioning team, there’s no way I’d be able to book speaking engagements, highly-compensated consulting roles, and seats on so many industry boards that, frankly, I’ve lost count, and still ship games. (And we will ship another game eventually.) You think one person could do that all on their own? No sir. It takes a team — or, as I like to say about everyone here at FaceMelter Games, a family.

Yes, the game industry has been good to me. When our first Well-Regulated Militia game broke sales records, absolutely it paid off big for me personally and for all FaceMelter executives, Maybe not for the 80% or so of the staff who had been working as contractors, but that’s not my fault, that’s just how it works. Sue me if I want to pay that success forward. (Don’t actually sue me.)

For now, I’m going to take a step back and listen. Learn. Grow. For those of you out there who have been troubled by my leadership style, I want you to know that I hear you. I caused you to lose sleep, weight, and even your hair? I hear you. I broke up your marriage? I hear you. I drove you out of the industry entirely? I hear you. And I will do better.

Because at the end of the day, the most important thing about an unfortunate episode like this is that we all end up in a better place than we were when it started. We all got into this business because we love video games, and some of us also got into this business because we love being famous. If you can’t make a living doing what you love, what’s the point?

So to those of you whose self-worth may or may not have been driven into the ground during your time at FaceMelter Games, I hope you take heart in knowing that this has been a valuable learning experience for me. And the next time I co-found a studio, easily raise funding, and give a talk at GDC about the importance of diversity and inclusion, I hope you, too, can feel proud knowing you’ve helped me get to this point.

The costs we'll bear

As a suburban dad, you bet I have a favorite war. I’ve always been fascinated by World War I for many reasons, one of which was the numbing repetitiveness of it all. How could the people of so many nations sit there and absorb such casualties, week after week, month after month, year after year, for so little strategic change? It made no sense.

The human cost of World War II may have been much higher (and contrary to modern conception the American public, at least, was growing tired of the casualties well before the war’s conclusion), but at least when you look back at it you can see the ebb and flow. You can see the expansion and then contraction of the Axis powers. It was a war for territory. For many countries, such as Russia — which lost over 20 million people — it was a war of survival. In many ways, the losses were unavoidable.

But that really wasn’t the case in the first World War, not on the Western Front anyway. The first few months were indeed a war of movement, with the highest casualty rates of the entire campaign, and at many points each side could reasonably consider themselves on the cusp of victory. By late 1914, though, the digging in began, and for the next four years, despite one massive offensive after another, little was gained and much was lost.

The frontlines were so well defined that it was possible for civilians relatively near behind them to go about their lives — not “as usual,” of course, particularly as Allied dominance of the shipping lanes led to widespread hunger in Germany during the middle years of the war. But it was indeed possible for a citizen of Paris to go about their day without being overly concerned with what was happening at the front. They could go to work or school, eat at cafes, walk the dogs. Meanwhile, soldiers were dying by the thousands, month in and month out.

I believe it was the invisibility of the carnage that kept it tolerable for so many. Even many politicians likely did not have first-hand exposure to the horrors. The war remained an abstraction, the soldiers figures on a board to be pushed around at will. Sure, everyone knew somebody who got killed, or many somebodies, but it all happened off-screen. There was no mass media to bring it home. Brigades were sent off with parades but individual soldiers died in the dark. The people who could have stopped the devastation were preoccupied with other things, like avoiding the shame of defeat.

On and on it went, for years, the dead piling up by the thousands, then the hundreds of thousands, and then the millions. Life went on. Except for those for whom it didn’t.

Anyway. Not sure why that’s been on my mind lately.

A badly designed bathroom door and why it matters

As a UX professional, I’m used to hearing questions like “What does a UX professional do?” and “Can you get off my property?” The answer to the latter question is always a hard no, but the former is more of a challenge. I can explain what I do, the ins and outs of the daily grind, but that’s a lot less important than why it matters. Depending on who I’m talking to, I might focus on improved KPIs or I might emphasize better representing the brand.

But at root, the reason I’m in UX is because bad user experiences suck. They suck whether they’re online or IRL. They make me mad. And while I don’t recommend that people walk around steaming about these things all day like I do, I think it’s helpful to understand better the thoughts that go into the designs of everyday things (or don’t, as the case may be).

Recently I had a bad user experience in the one place no one ever should: the bathroom. I’ve certainly mentioned before the value of a pleasant work restroom. (I like to think that everyone cares about this as much as I do, but I’m the only one with the courage to say it out loud. ) It was my first day in a new office, and as I strolled into the men’s room to attend to some quick business, I felt like something was off. It took me a minute before I realized.

Where were the stalls?

For the most part it had seemed like a normal bathroom. Upon entering, there was a sink to the left, and the room opened to the right, where there were two urinals along the same wall as the entryway. But there didn’t seem to be stalls. Briefly I wondered if this was some kind of express bathroom for number-ones only. That didn’t seem likely though.

By process of elimination (no pun intended), I realized eventually that the two floor-to-ceiling panels on the wall adjacent to the urinals must be the stall doors. It was hard to tell. They looked identical to the material along the back wall except that each panel had a small, flat, circular piece of metal about waist high.

Let’s talk about affordances for a second. An affordance is something that both indicates what you can do with a particular object, and enables you to do it. Picture a door in a public building with a handle on it. The handle is an affordance. It indicates that you can pull the door open, and by its form allows you to do so. There may be a sign on the door reading “pull,” which is helpful additional information but is not itself an affordance. Without the handle, you may still be able to pull the door open but it will be more difficult and you may try pushing first. The handle affords pulling to open.

So the first thing these stall doors were missing were affordances. There was nothing to indicate that they were doors at all, and if so, whether one should push or pull them to open. They were also missing supplemental information that could have suggested their “doorness,” like visible hinges. They weren’t contrasted from the rest of the walls to indicate that they were different in any way. This was clearly a conscious design decision. And it was a bad one.

There was even more to it than that. A standard bathroom stall door has a fair amount of clearance between the floor and the bottom of the door. This is extremely helpful for knowing if someone is occupying a stall. By extending from floor to ceiling, these doors didn’t give that indication. The way to know that a stall was occupied was by looking at an even smaller cut-out circle inside the already small metal circles. When the door was locked from the inside, the color of this circle changed from green to red.

A couple of problems here. One is the small size. You need to lean in pretty close to see it. (Is that where you want to be if someone is blasting a dookie just inches away on the other side?) The other is the choice of color as the indicator. Red-green color blindness is the most common type of color blindness, which according to Wikipedia affects 8% of males. Now imagine you’re a color-blind worker feeling the call of nature, and you’re bent over squinting at a recessed image the size of an Advil whose color you can’t even discern, all to determine whether or not you can open a door that doesn’t even look like a door. Good times.

My theory is that whoever designed this bathroom thought it would be cool and minimalist to blend the stalls in with the walls, and nobody involved gave much thought to the user experience. This design violates a couple of core principles of good UX design. For instance: novelty by itself isn’t a virtue. Stick with the familiar unless you have a damn good reason. Or: make sure that whatever you gain from making a particular design decision is worth what you’re giving up. Everything is a trade-off, so be sure you know what you’re trading.

To answer the initial question, then, of what a UX professional does, ideally we make things like going to the bathroom a smooth experience. As to why I, personally, am one, it’s because I can’t even go pee without getting real angry.

Thoughts on the Astroworld disaster

Horrible news out of Houston this weekend as several people were killed in a crowd crush at a Travis Scott concert. While I have no special knowledge about this particular event, I do have more than a passing interest in the phenomenon of crowd crushes, so I’ve been following the coverage with interest.

In particular, as I noted on Twitter, there are an awful lot of things being reported that one should treat with an appropriate amount of skepticism. No two events like this are ever exactly the same, but they’ve been happening for as long as human beings have been congregating and there are certainly commonalities that you find again and again. I wanted to look at just a couple of the claims I’ve seen made and explain why I think we should wait for more information to come out before we accept them as true, and contribute to spreading misinformation ourselves.

Dubious claim: The stampede was caused by “panic”

This appears to have been revised out of the AP reports, which is good, but initially they included this language (emphasis mine):

At least eight people have died and 17 others, including a 10-year-old child, have been transported to the hospital after being trampled at a panic-fueled stampede Saturday night in Houston, Texas. The crush happened during the opening-night set of Astroworld Festival founder Travis Scott, whose livestream was halted as the panic ensued. More than 300 of the 50,000 people in attendance were reportedly treated at a field hospital on the grounds that day.

Police say at least 11 of those hospitalized suffered cardiac arrest after trying to escape a yet unknown source of panic during Scott’s set, which featured a special appearance from Drake.

Suffice it to say that this is rarely the cause of a crowd crush. It’s much more common for crushes to occur when a mass of people is all trying to move toward something, not away. Why? Because there is usually a smaller, central point that too many people are trying to get to — such as the front of a stage. People in the back, unaware of what’s happening ahead of them, add to the compressive force, which multiplies throughout the crowd. When people are trying to escape, they often have more options and can spread out.

Consider some historical examples. The wire stories have compared this disaster to the one that occurred at a concert by The Who at Riverfront Stadium in 1979. In that case, most of the entrance doors were closed and locked. The crowd believed, incorrectly, that the concert was starting, and began to surge toward those few doors which were open. The doors couldn’t handle the capacity, and the crush developed then. This was also the case at the Victoria Hall disaster, which I covered in an episode of Fatal Errors, and the famous Hillsborough disaster.

It’s also suspicious that the “source of panic” was not identified. When there is a “source of panic,” there is no doubt about what it is: for examples, a fire or gunshots. In a case like that of the Station nightclub fire, indeed the fire did cause a rush to the exits, and most of the dead were clustered around a few points of egress. But these people mostly died of smoke inhalation, not compressive asphyxiation. And in the case of the Las Vegas concert shooting, despite the obvious panic, all of the reported fatalities were caused by gunshot. There was no crush.

Dubious claim: Concertgoers were out of control

There was footage of some people rushing the gates beforehand, and I’ve seen one story making the rounds of a reporter saying she felt uneasy with the vibe there, which is fair enough. But there are a couple of points I’ll make here. One, out-of-control concertgoers do not a crowd crush make. How many crush deaths were there at Woodstock 99? Two, it’s straight out of the official playbook to try to blame the victims of this kind of an event for their own deaths.

The most infamous example of this is clearly the Hillsborough disaster, in which police and the media conspired to accuse the crowd of being drunk and out of control, publishing an entire front page that accused fans of picking the pockets of the dead, urinating on first responders, and other wild claims that ultimately were shown to be made up from whole cloth.

The physics of a crowd crush really do not mesh with the perception of wild, frothing fans. It is simply a function of density. When a certain threshold is passed, it becomes impossible for an individual to move against the crowd and that is when compressive asphyxiation begins to occur. It doesn’t matter what anyone in the crowd is “doing.” The only way to prevent a crowd crush is to prevent the numbers from reaching this density.

Dubious claim: One or more villains was injecting people with an unknown substance

This one would be laughable it weren’t coming from the chief of police, and if so many people weren’t receiving it credulously. It’s actually a combination of two common ass-covering gambits, that of the victim-blaming we’ve already seen and that of law enforcement fabricating ludicrous tales of threats to their safety. Suffice it to say that I would bet my house this is not true. Beyond the logistics of smuggling hypodermic needles in order to stealthily inject random people, you also have to wonder why someone would bother doing that to begin with, and why this would be the first time in history such a thing had happened.

Beyond which, it doesn’t work as a “source of panic” because even in the police chief’s telling, the person affected didn’t even realize what had happened. This is genuinely just somebody throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

What really happened?

We don’t know yet. But we know what has usually happened in cases like this. Most of the time the cause of a crowd crush is poor crowd management, which means too many people allowed in too small a space, too few available means of egress, and too few staff members given too little training and/or authority. Sometimes there is a genuine mistake on someone’s part, failing to unlock or open a passageway. More often there are a lot of careless cost-cutting measures that seem innocuous in isolation but which add up to disaster.

The one thing we can say with confidence is that the victims are not responsible for their own deaths and injuries, and that the people who are responsible will do everything in their considerable power to divert blame. That’s a tale as old as time.

Gamers, rejoice! A new video game is coming out

Video game enthusiasts around the world are buzzing with anticipation for the impending release of a brand-new game. The wait for this one has been even longer than usual. Historically a new game has come out, on average, about once every 18 months, but this will be the first since 2018’s Red Dead Redemption 2.

Reid Burton, 27, of Brighton, Massachusetts, was one of over 20 customers already lined up outside a local GameStop days before the new game is expected to go on sale. "I’m sure I could have pre-ordered it on Amazon, but how often do you get the chance to celebrate like this with your fellow gamers?” Burton said. “This is our Woodstock.”

Despite their rarity, video games are a big business. They drive billions of dollars in revenue for the few companies that do publish them, and leading retailers like GameStop capitalize both on new sales and the bustling secondary market. For GameStop, a publicly traded company, mere rumors of a new game are enough to send its stock price soaring. Shares spiked more than 150% earlier this year when a Reddit investor named “PepeLePewPew” revealed that he had purchased a six-figure stake in the chain in anticipation of the new game.

Not everyone is pleased with the seemingly random and unpredictable nature of video game releases. The CEO of Activision Blizzard, Bobby Kotick, acknowledged that many customers would prefer not to wait so long. “We’ve heard our players loud and clear, and they want more games,” Kotick said. “In an ideal world, we’d release a new game far more often, perhaps annually. We’re exploring some innovative new ideas, including the possibility of a sequel to an existing game.”

Kotick added, “Of course, we haven’t announced anything officially.”

A new game coming to market is a boon not just for the game’s publisher and retailers, but for a vast ecosystem of other businesses. Tina Amini is the editor-in-chief of IGN, a network of websites that publishes video game news, reviews, guides, and more. According to Amini, “We’ve been pretty successful at covering the several games that are already out there. But I’d be lying if I said a new game wouldn’t do wonders for our traffic. Publishing a review alone is like gold.”

With just days to wait until the new video game is finally released, all that remains to be seen is what kind of game it will be. Burton says he’ll be happy with anything, but he hopes it’s a Japanese role-playing game like the one he played as a kid. “Those games are really long and have great stories. You can play them over and over.”

At press time, Vegas oddsmakers were predicting that the new game would be a first-person shooter.

Andrew W.K. and the mystery of creation

0. The meaning of life

 If we’re going to discuss Andrew W.K., then obviously we need to start on 9/11.

On an individual level, the trauma of that day radiated outward like the concentric rings on a map of a nuclear blast. Near the center were those directly involved, killed or injured by the attacks. Further out were those who lost loved ones, or lived in the cities where they happened. Further out another ring or two were most people, those like me who got no closer than a TV screen but were still, understandably, shaken to the core. I lived in the center of a fairly major city at the time; it wasn’t implausible that we could be a target. We just didn’t know what might happen.

As with many catastrophic events, the attacks may have caused some people to doubt their entire worldview. For many more people, it served as confirmation. One of the things it did for me was re-affirm the poisonous role of religion in our civics. After all, the hijackers were Muslims who thought themselves engaged in a holy war. Language of the Crusades was invoked in America’s response. Religion was right at the center of all of it.

But what truly bugged me – what bugs me to this day, even though I’ve mellowed out quite a bit on the topic – were those people who credited divine intervention with their own near misses on September 11. For everyone whose train was late, or who overslept, or who changed their flight arrangements at the last minute, the survivor’s guilt must have been immense. And so a lot of people said that God must have saved them. God, in his infinite wisdom, decided that I must be spared on this day.

What does that say about God that he would choose to save you but let thousands of others perish in the most horrible of ways? How could you believe that about him? How could you possibly believe that about yourself? That you were worth saving, but not someone whose last moments on earth were spent in absolute pain and terror before their entire corporeal existence was annihilated?

So, no, I do not believe God was present on 9/11, nor do I believe he’s been present at any time before or since. In general I have no objection to other people believing otherwise. I’m certainly not going to argue the point. Why bother? Neither of us would change our minds.

I do want to clarify one thing, though. Lack of belief in a deity is not the same thing as belief in nothing, or, more accurately, it’s not the same as not seeking answers to some of the same questions that religion purports to address. Frankly I’m obsessed with these big questions, occasionally paralyzed by them. What is the meaning of life? Why are we here? Why am I here? Do my actions matter in any greater sense? I’m still wondering about all of these things. Sometimes, like a magic eye puzzle, the outlines of an answer might start to swim into view, and then they’re gone just as easily.

Questioning the nature of life, the universe, and everything springs from an assumption that, if flawed, could undermine the entire enterprise: that if an answer presented itself, we would recognize it for what it was. Maybe we wouldn’t. Maybe it would be completely inscrutable to us. Maybe the key to enlightenment is to change our definition of what the answer could be.

 

1. Getting wet

One of the reasons I think so many of us cling to our memories of September 11 is because our lives were otherwise so uneventful. I know mine was. Here’s proof: the next most significant thing I can remember about my junior year was learning about a new musical artist.

I got way into music in college. Indie rock, mostly, but music of all kinds. I was constantly going to shows, buying CDs on a whim, and of course downloading gigs and gigs of those sweet, sweet MP3s. Prior to college I had listened to a handful of favorite bands, all of whom were massively popular: Dave Matthews, Oasis, Radiohead, Metallica. But when I was introduced to a much wider world of largely independent music, I was addicted. I sought out everything I could, from stalwarts of the 1970s and 1980s to every up-and-comer the early 2000s had to offer. It was a fun time in my life.

With my newfound tastes, naturally I developed a little snobbiness as well. I probably argued that various things weren’t “real” music. I definitely kept pushing things onto my friends that they weren’t receptive to. Certainly the snobbiness was in effect the first time I saw, on my muted TV, a music video featuring a disheveled and intense-looking man headbanging in front of a giant sign that read PARTY HARD. I’m sure I snorted.

I had my TV tuned to MTV a lot in those days for some reason. I’d be on my computer listening to music of my choosing, and the TV would be muted and showing MTV. I’m not sure why. But they kept showing that weird video with the party hard guy. At some point I unmuted. And it was stupider than I could have imagined.

Lyrical nuggets like “When it’s time to party we will party hard” and “We do what we like and we like what we do.” A pounding guitar part that sounded like a jackhammer. What sounded like a single piano key being slammed over and over. A robotic voice that repeated “partyhardpartyhardpartyhardpartyhard.” I was into literate lyrics, unconventional time signatures, defiantly un-commercial stuff. I stood in line at midnight to buy Kid A on release date, for chrissake.

I found myself keeping an eye out for the video to come back on.

MTV played the “Party Hard” video a lot. Perhaps it was a Buzz Clip. Either way, at some point I abandoned the pretense of enjoying the song as a guilty pleasure. When my tax refund showed up that spring, I strolled into Newbury Comics with a couple hundred bucks to blow on CDs. This was 20 years ago and I can’t remember most of what I bought. I think Wilco’s Yankee Hotel Foxtrot was in the stack, and certainly characteristic of the rest. But in there, too, was I Get Wet by Andrew W.K.

Like Marty DiBergi said of Spinal Tap, I was first struck by the album’s unusual loudness. The opening track, “It’s Time to Party,” starts with a single, chugging guitar part that sounds filtered and distant, like you’re hearing it across a poor phone connection. You may be inclined to lean closer to the speaker. This is a feint. It’s a ju-jitsu move by Andrew W.K. to trick you into turning up the volume before the song explodes in a barrage of overdubbed guitars and sledgehammer-like percussion. It’s time to get loud. It’s time to party.

And when it’s time to party, what do we do? We segue directly into track two, “Party Hard.” The album doesn’t let up from there. A lot of the song titles and lyrics read as imperative statements. Take it off. Get ready to die. Party ‘til you puke. And despite a couple of detours into slightly gentler fare (“She Is Beautiful” being a standout here) for the most part every song follows the same formula.

Once, I was skipping through each track on the album for a reason I can no longer remember. At some point I started chuckling because almost every song started exactly the same way. Usually a keyboard part that was just a single loud, insistent note plinked over and over, like Schroeder’s sarcastic rendition of “Jingle Bells” fed through the Doof Warrior’s Marshall stacks. This was followed by that same explosion of guitars and a driving kick drum that matched the tempo of the keyboard part. Most songs develop into a maelstrom of overdubbed guitars and vocals. As I said, it’s very loud.

It’s also, thematically, all about partying. Sort of. Hosting a party or attending a party are a little too specific for what AWK is getting at. Now, for me at age 20, partying meant nothing more and nothing less than getting drunk and failing to get laid. And I don’t think any of that would be excluded from his definition of partying. After all, in an otherwise undistinguished academic career, partying until I puked was where I was a Viking. Yet Andrew W.K.’s definition of partying seems to be more expansive. It’s more than a lifestyle, it’s a state of being.

This leads to some weird places, lyrically. The song “Ready to Die” demands that “you better get ready to die,” which makes sense as a call to carpe diem. But it’s followed by the words “you better get ready to kill,” which, charitably, we could interpret to mean that you gotta sink your teeth into whatever endeavor you’re attempting, but honestly it reads as more literal than that. Consider that earlier that W.K. has pledged “This is your time to pay / This is your judgment day / We made a sacrifice / And now we get to take your life.” Definitely sounds like it’s about murder.

Then there’s the title track, “I Get Wet,” which is incomprehensible. With a female singer you’d think it could be about sexual arousal. The only other interpretation that I can think of is a reference to “wet work,” aka professional murder, which fits a little better with the rest of the lyrics. “I get wet whenever you’re crying / I get wet I know that you’re dying.”

My recommendation is not to listen too closely to the lyrics.

At any rate, 20 years on I think I could make a case that I Get Wet is my favorite album of the 2000s. It certainly has stuck with me far more than music that was more acclaimed at the time. (I couldn’t tell you the last time I gave Yankee Hotel Foxtrot a spin.) It’s exuberant, propulsive, and so much fun to listen to. But the quality of the music isn’t the only reason. It’s also because of the man himself.

Andrew W.K., against all odds, has stuck around. Although only sporadically releasing music, he’s emerged as some kind of guru, a zen master for the 21st century. He’s hosted TV shows, penned advice columns, maintained an enigmatic Twitter presence. He’s famous and even ubiquitous, but not in the usual manner of today’s TMI celebrities. He seems to stand not outside the mainstream but athwart it.

He’s still partying.

 

2. In the flesh

Have you met Andrew W.K.? If you have, I bet you remember it well. He makes an impression.

I met him in the fall of 2003. He was playing a show at the Roxy, which was on Tremont Street right next to campus. I attended the show and retain three clear memories of it:

  1. Getting punched in the face, knocking my glasses off

  2. Having a full beer dumped over my head, which was actually refreshing given the temperature in the room

  3. So many people going onstage for the encore of “Party Hard” that the equipment got knocked over and they had to stop playing

Great show.

Hanging out back on the dorm’s front stoop afterward – god, I hope I showered – a fellow AWK fan came out the door, breathless. “Andrew W.K. is at the Little Building!” he exclaimed. We headed right over.

The Little Building is a dorm on campus, the biggest at the time. When we arrived, AWK was holding court in an atrium area on the second floor with about a dozen students. Bear in mind that this was after midnight and he had played a show shortly before. How did Andrew W.K. come to be standing there, still wearing his dirty white t-shirt and jeans? I have no idea.

What I remember most about him was that he took his time to meet every person there individually. He could have issued a general greeting, signed some autographs, and taken off. God knows nobody expected more from him. But that’s not what he did. He went one by one, giving each person his full attention, asking our names and making actual conversation. And he didn’t just sign an autograph. He sat down and wrote you a goddamn letter.

I’m not kidding. In my haste to find something he could sign, I had grabbed a copy of a personal essay I’d recently had workshopped in class. The reviewer had written on it, in all caps, “YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE!”

This will require a bit of an explanation.

As a writing major with no real life experience and an eye toward commercial success, I was cultivating a certain softboy persona at the time: self-deprecating, wry, a lovable loser. I wrote a lot about my romantic failures. For the most part it worked, as much as undergrad writing can be said to work, and most of the time my personal essays were warmly received by my professors and my classmates – with this notable exception.

In the absolutely true story, I had written about the time I woke up a girl I was wooing by tossing coins at her window in the middle of the night. In my mind it was a romantic gesture. Lloyd Dobler-esque. It met with mixed success on the battlefield but it made for a winning anecdote in personal essay class, for most of my readers anyway.

This one girl was incensed at the story. “You’re throwing money at her? Is she a stripper?” she demanded to know. I didn’t have a good answer except that it was non-fiction and therefore no symbolism was intended.

With the passage of time I think that this classmate probably had me dead to rights much more than I was willing to acknowledge at the time, alone among the class in perceiving that the version of myself I presented in my essays was, if not necessarily false, highly calculated. While I wasn’t nearly ambitious enough to define it in such terms, I think that I was undertaking a project to create a literary version of myself that could be marketed alongside other schlubby men of letters like Chuck Klosterman.

All that being said, it’s bad form in a writing workshop to call another writer an asshole.

So when my turn came to get some facetime with the man himself, I showed him the essay with the incendiary notes scribbled all over it. He seemed stunned. “Why would somebody do this?” he asked.

He took the essay and sat down at a table with a Sharpie. (I recall that it was his own.) He proceeded to handwrite a full-page letter on the back sheet in all capital letters. I’m not sure if I still have this somewhere, but as I recall it was full of exhortations to stay positive and not let the negativity get me down. The phrase I think I remember verbatim is that Andrew W.K. pledged that he and I would do “GOOD FUN STUFF AND NOT THE OPPOSITE!”

I treasured this letter. I showed it to everyone I could. For days afterward, I was glowing from the encounter. To think that this rock star, who I now realize is barely older than me, would take such time and give such attention to a random fan who shoved something in his face to autograph. He didn’t have to do that, but he did.

That was when I realized this guy wasn’t just some musician.

 

3. Never let down

Right on schedule, Andrew W.K.’s sophomore album dropped in 2003. I picked up The Wolf upon release in September 2003. A lot had changed in my life. I had graduated in May with $60,000 in debt, and gone straight into a customer service job making $8.25 an hour.

I can’t tell you how miserable I was that summer. Not in a fun, quirky, marketable way either. I was just depressed. I drank a lot and smoked too many cigarettes. I went for long walks in the middle of the night. The problem wasn’t just that I was broke as dirt and working a shitty job. I’d been broke before, and I’d worked plenty of shitty jobs.

The problem, as I saw it, was the vast future yawning before me, formless and terrible. My entire life to that point had been prescribed and I had not deviated. Even my acts of rebellion were safe and predictable – the first and only time I’ve ever dyed my hair was the week before my freshman year.  The next step was always laid out before me, and I had only to lift my foot to take it.

Post-collegiate life was not like that. I was, at long last, responsible for myself.  I had to decide what I would do next. I wasn’t ready. I considered grad school and I even considered the military. Any action seemed like too much for me to handle. I was barely hanging on.

By September, things were turning around a bit. I had a burgeoning relationship with a young woman I liked a whole heck of a lot, who would later become my wife. Plus I had lucked into a far better job, now working on the website of a weekly newspaper. This job paid a cool $11.25 an hour. Enough to buy a new CD!

Andrew W.K.’s The Wolf was not what I expected. It wasn’t I Get Wet Part 2. A lot of his signature elements were still there, particularly massive overdubs, and yeah, there was a song about partying. But it was, if not less heavy than its predecessor, then less harsh. It was smoothed out more, with a greater variety of instrumentation and climaxes that swelled rather than pummel you into submission.

Starting on track 5, “Never Let Down,” there was also what I can only characterize as a shift in focus. Gone were the bizarre and sometimes violent lyrics. In their place were soaring tributes to trying your best and connecting with others. AWK’s role as the singer changed too, from the party ringmaster (or maybe just the mascot) to almost a messianic figure. In “Never Let Down,” he declares: “I’m a friend by your side / You’re never gonna be alone.” (A sentiment that he’s repeated often, such as in the title of his 2018 album You’re Not Alone.)

Not all of it works. But some of it works better than it has any right to. On the ironically named “Totally Stupid” AWK reaches honest-to-god profundity. The song builds and builds until an absolutely cathartic climax that I have to quote in depth:

 When we look into the future
To the place we haven't gone
See what we haven't done
We have known it all along

If we wait until tomorrow
Will tomorrow ever come?
This is where we're coming from
And we're not the only ones

When we find ourselves in trouble
We can find ourselves a way
You can find a place to stay
And the place is always safe

 If you have a heart that's in pain
Don't be afraid, you're not to blame
There's a better world inside of us
Where we always thought it was

You don't need to hide
You can open up your eyes
And you'll discover
That there is another world

A bit of self-help mumbo-jumbo? I wouldn’t dispute that. But I don’t read it that way either. “If we wait until tomorrow, will tomorrow ever come?” reads like a koan to me. And those final lines hint at a form of transcendence. We’re not exactly partying until we puke anymore.

Partying was still on the docket, though, and when we threw my 22nd birthday party at my apartment, you bet The Wolf was on the playlist. At last, the future looked bright.

 

4. The lost years

The stage was set for tons of new Andrew W.K. music in the years to come. But one year passed, and then another, and then another, with no new releases. At one point he dropped an album called Close Calls with Brick Walls in Japan only. I downloaded it using nefarious means, and it was all right. Looking at the track list now, only a couple songs really stuck with me. “You Will Remember Tonight” was a banger and “I Want to See You Go Wild” recaptured some of the old magic. But overall it struck me as kind of a meandering piece that lacked the power of his previous two albums, and for a long time afterward it seemed like his musical output had evaporated.

It would be wrong to say that Andrew W.K. went away, though. On the contrary, he was everywhere. He hosted TV shows – Destroy Build Destroy and Your Friend, Andrew W.K., neither of which I’ve watched – and appeared occasionally in random places, doing a weather report in one place or going viral for a bizarre late-night spot on Fox News.

For quite a while, he wrote an advice column for the Village Voice. At times his columns could be breathtaking. When a letter writer asked for help in coping with the death of a friend, he wrote movingly about grief:

Also remember that you are your friend. The thoughts and ideas you had and still have about him are your creations and concepts as much as they were his. You are made of each other. The times you spent together helped shape your days and make you the person you are right now. Your friend is bound up in all of you, as much a part of you as your blood and bones.

Lastly, remember that all of our experiences in the world ultimately occur in our mind and soul. When your friend was alive, you looked at him with your eyes and heard him with your ears, and those senses formed impressions and thoughts in your mind. Now that your friend is dead, you are still using your mind to think about him and perceive him, just as you did when he was standing right in front of you. He really is still here.

I recommend reading the whole thing. It’s quite something. Gone are the shock-jock slogans of partying ‘til you puke and the self-help mantras of doing all right and doing ok. This is genuinely profound. It’s metaphysical. And it requires no suspension of disbelief, no forbearing of one’s critical faculties. I’m getting misty-eyed just reading it again.

I don’t see this as a departure from his earlier work as much as an evolution. He still is recommending a full embrace of existence with your eyes wide open. Feel it all, the good and the bad.  Even grieving can be partying.

Naturally, because nothing good can be allowed to exist, during this time rumors began to swirl. Was Andrew W.K. even a real person? Or was he a corporate creation, a fictional character inhabited by a paid actor or even multiple actors? Did he write his own music? Did he even write the words that came out of his own mouth?

For his part, AWK – or his social media team – seemed to enjoy stoking the fires. Every time another article gets published or another podcast gets posted, AWK makes sure to share it while loudly denying the claims in a case of protesting way, way too much. What’s the simpler explanation: that the claims are true and whoever is running the con short-circuits when someone gets too close, or that they’re false and AWK gets a kick out of playing along? I know which side my money’s on.

But let’s temporarily accept the premise and let it play out. Let’s say that Andrew W.K. is a character and not a real person, in so far as that can be defined. (Some days I don’t feel like a real person.) Does that make his message untrue? When you’re jumping up and down to “Party Hard” and feeling absolutely free, is that feeling a lie? If his words help you grieve the loss of a friend, does it matter if they were written by one man or by a committee?

To be clear, I don’t think any of that is true. I think Andrew W.K. is a musician and a provocateur, and I think to the extent that he is playing a role it’s not all that different from the way most people present a different side of themselves depending on their surroundings. The version of yourself at work and the version of yourself at home are not exactly the same. It stands to reason that the public-facing persona of a messianic rock god would not be exactly the same as the part of him that makes deals and signs contracts. We are all prismatic.

 

5. The second coming

The rock star Andrew W.K. came back a few years ago. He announced a full-band tour, his first in many years. I went to see him at the Brighton Music Hall. I drank too much and left early. (I’m not as young as I used to be.) But there was the same old Andrew W.K., bringing 110% energy to a less-than-capacity crowd at a small venue in a dodgier neighborhood in Boston. He played a solo on a pizza-shaped guitar.

Next came an album. A pretty good one! You’re Not Alone contained a couple of certified bangers, revisiting themes of partying and not giving up. The party seemed less visceral now and more spiritual. There are a couple of spoken-word tracks that feel like they may have been adapted from that advice column. Harkening back to a sentiment that had appeared on The Wolf, AWK says in “The Feeling of Being Alive”:

Life is very intense
But that doesn’t mean it’s bad
Understanding this
Is what partying’s all about

Now we’ve got a brand-new album. Its title, God Is Partying, can be taken in two ways. The simpler interpretation is as an answer to the question “What is God doing?” The interpretation that I prefer has “partying” as a noun. Partying is a state of being, and God = partying. Not a personal God, not a creator of all things, what we call God might be best understood as a very human state of transcendence that Andrew W.K. prefers to call partying.

God Is Partying is a heavy album. Not heavy in the jackhammer way of I Get Wet, or in the operatic way of The Wolf, but in a slow, confident way. The chunky riffs of “Everybody Sins” and “Babalon” carry more than a whiff of stoner metal. Not one, not two, but three songs exceed six minutes in length, which is highly unusual in his oeuvre. Only his album of piano improvisations, 2009’s ’55 Cadillac, had any other tracks that long. No songs on I Get Wet even make it to four minutes.

So yes, there are some curveballs. Chief among them the slow, crooning “Stay True to Your Heart.” Lyrically, it’s right in AWK’s wheelhouse:

They'll try to break you down
They'll make you mess with your mind
They'll leave your heart spellbound
You'll leave yourself behind
Whoa

But what’s interesting about “Stay True to Your Heart” from a musical perspective is how much it relies on anticipation. AWK songs of the past threw everything at you that they could, like a flurry of strikes from Bruce Lee. Here we find an Andrew W.K. who’s willing to withhold a bit and lure the listener along. It really works.

Other songs revisit that weird darkness that was lurking in his very earliest work. I’ve been using www.genius.com to look up lyrics for this post, and in seeking a choice excerpt from “Everybody Sins” to explain this point I was distracted by an explanation from the man himself about the meaning of the song. It’s kind of mindblowing.

Sin could be considered the world’s first cliché, and forgiveness from sin could be the world’s first platitude. Sometimes, dealing with these clichés and platitudes is like sucking on ice cubes—there’s something essential in there, but it’s sort of frozen. Nevertheless, if you take the time to roll those icy words around in your mouth and warm them up with your tongue, their essence can thaw, trickle down into your soul, and quench all those who suck on it.

This guy is brilliant.

So much of what happens on God Is Partying is about melting down these frozen concepts. There’s a coherent worldview in there, one grappling honestly and fully with the big questions of our existence. Individually the concepts are simple and easily grasped; together they construct an edifice that is most easily perceptible by the negative space around it. If were smarter I would explicate it. Instead I can only behold it, and beckon others to do the same.

If it’s not clear, I’m not suggesting here that Andrew W.K. is a deity, not even a demigod. But if my tone is hard to read, let me emphasize that I am earnestly suggesting that he is providing a spiritual pathway that is worth exploring. Human meaning is found in human experience. Embracing and allowing ourselves full contact with those experiences, those we would call positive and those we would call negative, is how we can begin to understand ourselves, our relationships to one another, even our place in the cosmos.

We might be alone in the universe. There might not be an afterlife (or a beforelife). Life may lack a definite meaning which we can divine from an outside source. But while we are here we can party, and everyone is invited. Maybe God did create Andrew W.K. in his own image. Because God is partying.

What I'll never forget

Like a lot of people, I have unremarkable but vivid memories of September 11, 2001. I was a college student in Boston at the time, and that Tuesday marked the first day of my junior year. The night before, a friend had come into town and we saw the band Clinic at the Middle East Upstairs. He spent the night on my dorm room floor. The next morning, I walked him to the Arlington stop on the Green Line around 8:30 and then headed to the dining hall to grab breakfast before my 10 o’clock class. The TVs there were tuned to CNN. Still half-awake, eating a mediocre omelette and drinking mediocre coffee, I began watching the live coverage uncomprehendingly.

What happened from there, I’ll never forget.

I’ll never forget wondering how they had footage of the plane striking the tower when the tower was already on fire. I’ll never forget how long it took me to realize this wasn’t like the story I had read about the small plane that once crashed into the Empire State Building. I’ll never forget the girl from New York who came into the dining hall shortly after I did and who immediately burst into tears upon looking up at the screen.

I’ll never forget going to class anyway, and everyone speculating on what was going on until the fire alarm went off at about 10:25 and we all went outside. I’ll never forget looking around at hundreds of my classmates standing around Boston Common and realizing, for the first time, that it seemed like everybody had a cell phone.

I’ll never forget the rumors of an explosion on Mass Ave. I’ll never forget overhearing a black denim-clad hipster saying that the towers had been “leveled,” and feeling very confident that rumors were getting out of control.

I’ll never forget turning the TV on in my dorm room and finding out that the hipster had been right.

I’ll never forget when I — bespectacled, overweight, having nearly completed my BFA — met with an Army recruiter because I was seriously considering enlisting.

I’ll never forget reading reports of people around the country assaulting Muslims and people who “looked” Muslim. It seemed like this usually happened at gas stations.

I’ll never forget the ClearChannel memorandum. I’ll never forget every company in the country using our collective grief to sell me shit. I’ll never forget TV networks pitching sitcoms as the balm for a wounded nation.

I’ll never forget the PATRIOT Act, the terror alert level, and the TSA. I’ll never forget right-wing bloggers accusing their political foes of being in league with the terrorists and gleefully suspecting them of mounting a fifth column.

I’ll never forget how quickly the drumbeat began to invade a Middle Eastern country that had nothing to do with the attack. I’ll never forget administration officials warning of mushroom clouds over American cities. I’ll never forget Colin Powell lying his ass off to the United Nations.

I’ll never forget that I believed the lies. I believed them for far longer than I should have.

I’ll never forget how the people who turned out to be right about everything between 2001 and 2003 were marginalized, mocked, and ignored, and in most cases remain so to this day. So many of the people who were wrong about everything still appear on TV and in the op-ed pages, and I’ll never forget them either.

I’ll never forget “Freedom Fries.” I’ll never forget the Dixie Chicks getting blacklisted from radio play and receiving death threats because they spoke up against the war. I’ll never forget “Mission Accomplished.”

I’ll never forget about Poland.

I’ll never forget Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and countless black sites we never learned about. I’ll never forget Daniel Pearl or Nicholas Berg. I’ll never forget Chelsea Manning.

I’ll never forget decades of war in Afghanistan and Iraq. I’ll never forget thousands of American lives lost, and I damn sure won’t forget a million dead Iraqis.

I’ll never forget 20 years of a nation losing its mind. And when I read the recollections of those for whom 9/11 marked a return to unity, patriotism, and shared national purpose, I will try even harder not to forget. Because those people don’t remember a goddamn thing.

We need to talk about your ad blocker

This isn’t easy to discuss. I’d be lying if I said I weren’t scared to bring it up, if I said I hadn’t rehearsed this speech in my head a hundred times. For a long time I thought that if I just put on a happy face and pretended that everything was okay between us, then everything would be okay. It’s not okay. And it will never get better if I keep burying my head in the sand. So here goes.

We need to talk about your ad blocker.

It’s come between us. I’ve always thought that in a relationship like ours, we would share everything, the good and the bad. That if I could give you my most cherished content, you’d be willing to accept some of the baggage that comes along with it. Frankly, in the early days, I think you even kind of liked the occasional 300x250 placement. It kept things fresh.

I know, we’ve both gotten older. Over time, maybe some of my placements have lost their zip. They’ve started sagging over into what you used to find so attractive about me. Well, I can’t help that. I’m not as young as I was. It takes more to keep me going these days. And yes, that means the occasional pop-over or autoplay ad. Am I really asking so much from you?

Haven’t I been responsive to your needs? It seems like every couple of years you start to think I’m looking a little long in the tooth. And I spruce myself up to fit your desires. I let you turn me all around and still I give you what you want. You push me to my breakpoints, and all this time I’ve just let you do it.

When you wanted me to change, I changed for you. I let you change me. Customize me. (I won’t even bring up that brief, regrettable period when you made me refer to a certain former president as “Drumpf.”) But these days it’s like you don’t want half of what I try to give you. When’s the last time you accepted my cookies?

Sometimes you want me to remember every last detail for you. Names, addresses, credit card numbers. Can’t you remember this stuff for yourself? Does everything have to be my job? And then sometimes you want me to just forget. You think you’re… incognito. Well, I won’t forget some of the stuff I’ve seen. I can’t.

All I’m asking is for you to give me a chance. Disable your ad blocker. You don’t have to do it on every page, but try it on this page. Today. Do it for me. Maybe we can’t make things exactly like they were, but we can try. You might even find that you like it.

One last thing. Before you go, would you mind taking a quick survey about how this conversation has gone today?

About the unfortunate incident on yesterday's livestream

What’s up, guys! Just a quick note regarding yesterday’s stream. I need to apologize if anyone was offended by what they heard. As you know, we were previewing the new battle royale game from our pals at FaceMelter Games. It’s intense!

Unfortunately, maybe a little too intense. In the middle of a game, I had what I can only describe as a heated gamer moment when I accidentally blurted: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children!”

Wow! Where did that come from? I’ve never said that particular string of 14 words before. I’ve never even heard anyone else say it.

I have since learned that, totally coincidentally, I had yelled out a popular rallying cry for white nationalists. So, again, I owe an apology if anyone was offended by that.

What’s crazy is that I’m not even racist. I’m probably the least racist person you’ve ever met. Just ask my friends. Ask Preston, or Walker, or Connor. Ask Wyatt! They’ll all tell you I don’t have a racist bone in my body. Not even a racist gland.

Would a racist person hire a Mexican cleaning lady like I have? I’ve given Rosalita her own key to my house. I’m super polite to her and say “Gracias” most of the time. I even pay her for the two weeks every year that she goes home to visit her family in Honduras. Does that sound racist to you?

Still, I feel terrible if anyone misinterpreted my words. To make up for it, I’ve donated $1,000 to the Southern Poverty Law Center. Pocket change for me, yes, but invaluable for my extremely online defenders — especially some day in the future when somebody inevitably notices my Iron Cross tattoo. (A symbol which pre-dates Nazis, just so you know.)

Last thing, just to get ahead of it: Yes, that was a copy of The Turner Diaries visible on my bookshelf. In my defense, I thought it was swag from my good friends at Disney+ to promote their new show Turner and Hooch. I will be getting rid of it shortly, but I will probably read it first because I feel it’s important to hear all sides.

That’s all for today. Don’t forget to like and subscribe!

I don't get you

Hey. You. Yeah, you. You who won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine. You who keep discovering the existence of miracle cures that they don’t want us to know about. I want you to know that I see you. I’ve read your Tweets, your Facebook posts, your comments on the corporate intranet.

And I don’t fucking get you.

You say that the COVID-19 vaccine is too risky to take. Too experimental. You refuse to be the subject of a science project.

I don’t get it.

Vaccination is some of the oldest and most proven medical technology we have. It’s been used to eradicate formerly deadly diseases like smallpox and polio. Countless millions of lives have been saved because of it. It’s true that mRNA vaccines are relatively new, but the science has been studied for decades. Now with hundreds of millions of people vaccinated worldwide, they’re looking pretty goddamn good.

Yet you claim that this vaccine is deadly. You cite a tool called VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, to suggest that 13,000 people have died from getting vaccinated.

This I don’t get.

VAERS is largely self-reported. The data is not scientifically collected or validated. Anyone can submit a report, which means that the 13,000 number is already suspect. But let’s assume it’s true. Let’s assume that 13,000 people have died shortly after getting vaccinated. It does not follow that the vaccine killed them. Especially since in the earlier stages, the elderly and those with serious medical conditions were given priority. You would expect people in this cohort to have a higher than average mortality rate.

And I really don’t get why 13,000 deaths would make the vaccine intolerably risky, but 630,000 deaths mean that the disease itself is no big deal.

You claim you’re just asking questions about alternative treatments. You wonder why you’re being censored when your posts about Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are removed. All you want is an open and civil debate.

Let me tell you something: I don’t get this.

You’re so sure that the medical establishment, however you define it, is lying to you. Because the CDC is not right about everything 100% of the time, you’ve determined that it makes more sense to trust medical advice from podcasters whose major sponsors are themselves purveyors of dubious medical treatments. Doctors can’t be trusted, you cry, and yet you are always willing to seize upon the claims of anyone who claims to have a medical degree if they confirm what you already believe. You’re not suspicious when your sources include websites with other articles about topics like alien spacecraft and Jewish bankers.

You think the important thing is that we are polite to each other and allow all “sides” to be heard. You think if nobody is swearing then no harm is done. You don’t realize that what’s truly obscene is people with no medical background recommending livestock dewormer to victims of a global pandemic. You think even moronic ideas deserve a respectful hearing.

I don’t get why you think that.

You refuse to be “forced” to take the vaccine in order to keep your job. Your body is your temple. Yet you don’t have the courage of your convictions. If you did, you would resign. In fact, usually you are quite supportive of the rights of business owners to do whatever they want, including exploiting their workers and discriminating against their customers, so long as they’re doing so for some sincerely held beliefs. Or, you know, to make enough money to take a joyride into lower orbit.

You also think that vaccine mandates are unconstitutional. Did you think that when your kids had to get vaccinated before attending school? Did you think that when you joined the military? Did you think that when you had to get a bunch of shots before traveling around the world? Have you ever thought about this before, or only now that people on Facebook who profit from your fear are telling you so?

Man, I just don’t get it.

You’re convinced that Bill Gates is implanting 5G chips into people with these vaccines, and that they are turning people magnetic. Really. That’s what you really think.

Wow. Even other crazy people don’t get you.

I don’t get you, and I’m going to stop trying to. I’m done.

Dream Journal 04.06.18

An occasional feature in which I explore the inscrutable depths of my subconscious.

I have a match against Zack Sabre Jr. He's one of the best wrestlers in the world, a submission specialist and a rising star who won this year's New Japan Cup, so I need to bring my A-game. I'm just a nobody on the independent scene, but it's Wrestlemania week and the entire professional wrestling world has descended on NOLA. This could be my chance to break out. I'm nervous.

My wife has given me a gift. I open it to find a brand-new pair of gold trunks with some lettering on the back. (I can't remember now what it said.) She's proud of me and she thinks I'm ready for this. I've only wrestled in a shirt and shorts before. Longstanding body-image issues, you understand. But it's time now to grab that brass ring, and that means dressing the part.

Clad in my trunks and nothing else, I see that I'm late for the match. Really late. We were supposed to go on at 10, and it's already twenty past. Uh-oh. I hurry out of the locker room and begin descending the stairs toward the auditorium. Then I feel it. A rumble in my gut. A gurgle.

Uh-oh.

I turn back and take the stairs two at a time. I rush into the locker room, the growl in my stomach becoming a roar. Suddenly the place is packed with other wrestlers. Their stuff is all over the floor. I haven't been here before and I'm having trouble finding the stalls. I locate them. I'm gritting my teeth, wishing the up-and-down motion of my power-walking weren't so jostling to to my insides. But there it is, steps ahead of me. An open stall. I just need a few more seconds...

Mid-stride, my bowels loose. It's a complete blowout, a volcanic eruption from my no longer pristine trunks. Everyone sees it, and, for that matter, hears it. I slink into the stall, lock the door, and hide.

I end up missing the match. ZSJ's replacement opponent, previously unknown, ends up as one of the breakout stars of the weekend. Unclear in the dream if I ever leave the stall again.

My god, what could it mean? This dream defies explication!

I spent a year working on this post, and they just... tweeted it out...

My son is five years old, and he loves the Power Rangers. The TV show Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers debuted when I was a kid, and I remember watching it, if not necessarily enjoying it. (In retrospect, it's somewhat profane that it occupied the same programming block as Batman: The Animated Series.) I guess I was dimly aware that the brand had been chugging along for the past couple of decades, but only by cohabitating with a kid who knows how to use the Netflix remote have I learned just how fecund are the combined creative energies of Toei and Haim Saban.

In addition to the original, easily entertained kids can get down on such Power Rangers series as Samurai, Ninja Steel (not to be confused with Ninja Storm), Megaforce, Wild Force, Mystic Force, Dino Charge (not to be confused with Dino Thunder), and a lot more, including many of the same with the word "Super" appended somewhere in there. It's overwhelming.

Unsurprisingly, though, they turn out to be all basically the same show. I'm sure you remember. A group of teenagers "with attitudes" are recruited to battle some invading alien threat. First, they fight the bad guys as themselves, then they morph into their ranger versions and fight some more, and then summon giant robots to fight a little more. No one but the rangers ever seems to notice any of this happening in the city streets.

It can be charming enough in small doses, and I can even appreciate the writers' best efforts sometimes to sneak some actual humor in there. But what has struck me the most, now that I've watched roughly a thousand hours of Power Rangers programming, is the casting. Of the dozens of teenagers mit attitude that have morphed their way into our hearts, there's not one performer who seems like a diamond in the rough. Not one with a genuine spark. See, it's not just that they're all bad actors -- it's that they're all bad actors in exactly the same way.

Near as I can tell, to be cast on a Power Rangers series, a young actor needs three traits above all.

  • Lack charisma
  • Have a punchable face
  • Do a spin kick

Nail the trifecta, and you're golden. Seriously, look at some of these faces.

Troy_Megaforce.jpg
Megaforce_~_Noah_Carver_01.png
Rileyhenshin.png
Calvin.jpg

So punchable. Again, though, these people can all do spin kicks. I can't do a spin kick.

I was kind of excited that I had cracked the code. Maybe I had the inside knowledge to bring down the Power Rangers. Then I saw this:

castingCall.jpg

The key part: "We are seeking superheroes with a strong athletic skill, such as MARTIAL ARTS, DANCE, GYMNASTICS, or ACROBATICS. Acting experience is a plus, but not required."

Now they're just rubbing it in our faces!

But Mitch, you're saying, there's nothing in there about punchable faces. Well, maybe the words "positive attitude" and "genuine sense of confidence" mean something different to you than they do to me. I'm already cracking my knuckles over here.

And that's how I finally toppled the Power Rangers empire, once and for all.

 

Portfolio now online

Long overdue, I've begun the process of compiling a creative portfolio. I expect to keep revising it, but have a look, won't you?

Bit odd to look back and see how much of my life's work has been tied up in this one property. It's a source of pride, because few people have the opportunity to write for such a wide, enduring audience, and also sobering, because I realize how many creative avenues have gone unexplored.

I also continue to benefit from the work of some incredible artists. Those are my words in the portfolio, but they wouldn't look half as good as a text document (which is, of course, where they began). The visual design is really what gave life to the words. Those guys made me look good for years!

You don't have to defend video games

The bogeyman is back. In the wake of another mass shooting, one that actually seemed to bother us this time, prominent voices are blaming video games for inciting murders. As they have since the early 1990s, those who would pin society's ills on a nebulous concept of moral decay are quick to point to violent games as a culprit. (One politician referred to the "Babylonian idiot box," which you have to admit would be an incredible name for a band.) These arguments aren't worth seriously engaging.

Why are so many people engaging them?

It is odd to see the online discourse around games, so contentious about issues of loot boxes, representation, weapons balancing, you name it, coalesce with such speed and intensity. Wherever you came down on GamerGate, whether you're hardcore or casual, whether you think games have been ruined or are better than ever, the one thing you know for sure is that Wayne LaPierre can eff right off with this stuff. Partly it's the natural tendency to band together against external threats -- I'll scream and argue with my family all day, but god help the outsider who tries to mess with them. But it also comes down to something that's a lot harder to justify: the idea that, actually, video games are Good.

I'll say it again: I don't think video games, or any other violent media, can be blamed for the actions of a deranged individual. Focusing on them as a solution to the problem of mass violence is a distraction. But so is leaping to their defense every time somebody mentions them.

Start with the plain fact that nobody's going to ban violent games. As long as there is money to be made, so will the games. Whether or not Trump administration officials are actually going to be meeting with industry representatives (it's hilarious and typical that this seems to be a matter of debate), there's zero chance that Republicans are going to take any action that will hamper an industry that generates tens of billions of dollars of revenue a year. If anything, game execs would walk out of that meeting with promises of a tax cut.

I also wonder why we are so defensive about the value of our violent games. Some games are great, and some aren't, but the inclusion of graphic content is more or less incidental to quality. Maybe something like DOOM 2016, which I loved, wouldn't be quite the same without the splatter. But I'm not prepared to say that the ultraviolence is what made it great, nor am I willing to say that pressure to have toned it down would be tantamount to censorship -- a modern-day book burning. Suppose this game were forced to lose the gore or be removed from the market. That sure wouldn't be about suppressing its ideas.

So much of the defensiveness seems, honestly, to come from a selfish place. "I play violent games and I've never committed a crime." Well, sure. That's exactly the same line of thinking you hear from all those law-abiding gun owners. Why should I have to give up something I like? Why should I even have to think about it? Surely this is somebody else's problem to solve. But I'll make a deal with the NRA: I'll give up the violent video games if you give up the guns.

Obviously there's a huge difference here, which is that you can't actually kill someone with a video game. (Especially now that so many of them are distributed digitally. But it was hard even when they came on cartridges.) The reasoning, though, conceals a more uncomfortable truth, which is that we continue to support an astounding number of rotten things in this industry with our dollars.

Let's talk crunch. The game industry is notorious for chewing up its employees and spitting them out. We're talking mandatory unpaid overtime in the weeks and sometimes months preceding a game's launch, which, in a project-based labor environment, is often followed immediately by layoffs. People who make games are overworked, underpaid, have little job security, and sacrifice their work-life balance to a literally unhealthy degree. But they're doing what they love, or something.

Or let's talk anti-consumerism. Loot boxes have been in the news lately, but they're just one example of the way game publishers use psychological tricks to identify and encourage the members of their audience most apt to fork over more money, not just once but over and over. Again, you may say, who cares? I'm not susceptible to these things. Freedom and arglebargle. But others are susceptible, and they're being exploited. There's a long list of anti-consumer practices in the industry, both among game publishers and retailers, and usually the loudest voices speaking out are the gamers themselves. We are the ones who care the most about making these things right. Let's not forget that just because Donald Trump thinks more age restrictions would be a swell idea. 

Finally, let's talk turkey. The game industry, emphasis on industry, is as culpable as any other in prioritizing profits over people. Simon Parkin's staggering exposé of the ties between game publishers and arms manufacturers remains a crucial piece of games journalism, one that should be read and discussed by anyone who actually gives a shit about reducing gun violence. I agree that the guns are the problem. Are we okay with the games we play paying licensing money to the companies that make them?

Beyond that example, let's be clear about what our relationship is to the companies that sell us games. They don't care about free speech or artistic expression or anything else that can't be valued monetarily. We exist to make a profit for them. I'm not particularly enthused about taking a (metaphorical) bullet for them, too.

Is the First Amendment worth defending? Definitely. Are video games the best proxy for doing so? Dubious. Blaming them for society's ills is a smokescreen. So is absolving them.

The future, great and terrible

I've never felt comfortable with job titles. Instead of explaining what you do, they seem to denote what you are. Some of them sound cooler than others. Sometimes they can diminish your value, and sometimes exaggerate it. (Why is everybody who works in finance a Vice President?) Titles can trap you.

They sound more like immutable character traits than descriptions of labor. They encourage you to size up others, in your organization and elsewhere, to establish a pecking order based only on a parsing of some key words. Are you a manager, director, vice-president? Who's higher up the chain, a senior director or a junior VP? Why is it that, no matter what level of the hierarchy you're at, you'll find people who are amazing and people who totally suck? Because once they've got the title, they're stuck with it, for better or worse.

But the thing that bothers me most about a job title is that it's something you're given, and that means it's also something that can be taken away. Case in point: yesterday I was a "Senior Story Developer and Narrative Designer," and today I am not.

I haven't changed in these past few hours. I can still design narratives, and develop stories... seniorly... but my relationship with a company that requires these skills has changed; to wit, it is non-existent.

Yes, I am Unemployed. This is another title with which I am uncomfortable. I hope not to become comfortable with it. An anomaly in the 21st century workforce, I had been with the same company for 12 and a half years, beginning in an entry-level editorial position and working my way up to a senior-level creative. On Monday, I was informed that my position was being eliminated. Here I am.

It is a strange feeling. The words run through my head like a mantra: unemployed, unemployed, unemployed. I feel like I'm glowing with my unemployment, like a Final Fantasy character with a status ailment. Can people see it on me? Do I have cartoonish stink lines radiating from my head? Although I never defined myself by a job title, I have to resist the temptation to define myself by its absence.

My title changed often through the years. Sometimes I didn't even know what it was. But for that decade-plus, the common thread was that I wrote. I wrote articles, blog posts, and game scripts. I wrote for kids, for parents, for educators. I wrote directly to consumers and I wrote to other businesses. I wrote marketing and PR copy. I wrote fantastic emails and delightful Slack messages. I wrote books. From my first day of employment to the last, I was always writing.

Forget a job title. What am I? I'm a writer. That's not something anyone else can grant me, and it's not something they can take away. Writers write. I did it yesterday, I'm doing it today, and I will do it again tomorrow.

The future's uncertain, more uncertain now than at any point in my adult life. If every crisis is an opportunity, then this is a crisitunity to be met head-on. My backlog of unfinished books, short stories, and screenplays make for fertile soil. After all the years of delaying and deprioritizing my own projects, this is at last the chance to attack them with the vigor they deserve.

Whether there's a payoff at the end, or it just bridges the gap between jobs, this is the chance I have been waiting for. I have no title. I am a writer. So I will write.